Skip to content
Грязинский Завод Цепей

Chain load tables

2026-10-14

Why different TUs have different columns

The set of columns in a load table is set not by the website but by the technical specification itself. That is why general-purpose chains (our class 3, TU 25.93.17-001-06515248-2020) have two loads in the table, and T8 lifting chains (TU 25.93.17-002-06515248-2026) have three. You cannot compare columns between TUs “head-on”: they have different meanings and different methodologies.

TU-001 (class 3): proof and breaking

  • Proof load (WLL) — the control load that the chain withstands without breaking and without residual deformation.
  • Breaking load (BL) — the load at which failure occurs.

Example for the size A1-3-6×19×21 (gauge 6 mm, pitch 19 mm):

LoadValue
Proof (WLL), kN8.5
Breaking (BL), kN17

TU-002 (class 8, T8): three columns

  • Acceptance proof load — the control load at acceptance; in our data it is 50 % of the breaking load.
  • Technological load — taken as in the TU table (whole kN), not recalculated from the breaking load.
  • Breaking load (BL) — the limit at which the chain breaks.

Example for the size 8×24-T8 (gauge 8 mm, pitch 24 mm, weight 1.4 kg/m):

LoadValue
Acceptance proof, kN40.3
Technological, kN48
Breaking (BL), kN80.6

Why T8 has no standardised WLL

In the class 8 TU the working load is not standardised — the acceptance, technological and breaking loads are. As a guide for selection, the industry-wide approach is used: the working load is taken as BL/4 (safety factor 4) — a reference value outside the TU. For critical load-handling operations, the safety factor and documents are agreed separately.

Safety factor when selecting

The safety factor is the ratio of the breaking load to the working load: for lifting chains it is typically 4–6. When selecting, rely on the working load with a safety factor, not on the breaking load: BL is a limit, not an operating mode.

Common mistakes

  1. Comparing the WLL of one chain with the BL of another. These are different quantities; this way you can “strengthen” the choice on paper and end up with a weak assembly in operation.
  2. Taking the breaking load as the working load. BL is always several times higher than the working load.
  3. Recalculating the T8 technological load from the BL. It is taken from the TU table.
  4. Carrying conclusions from one TU table directly into another. Comparing loads between different TUs requires reducing them to a single methodology — we will help with the correct wording.

Select by load

CallMessage